Saturday, December 29, 2012

Ethnic sports team names...

So the Atlanta Braves are planning to bring back the screaming Indian logo, which frankly looks pretty cool, doesn't it? But still, I winced at the same time.

Ethnic named sports teams, whether Braves, Indians, Redskins, tend to be about Native Americans. Why is that? Because we as a race of people killed them off to the point of being mystical about them. This song ("Cheyenne Anthem") from the American progressive rock group, Kansas, captures the majesty we clothed these people after we killed them, to take one cultural example (Great song, by the way).

So the question I've always had for those who love keeping those names is should we just go one step beyond and have more teams with ethnic names, and really get racy like with "Redskins"?

I think of the Lenny Bruce bit about making fun of ethnic slurs...

And then I think...

How about the New York Heebs? "The Heebs are comin' to town, folks. They lead the league in steals...livin' up to their proud name!"

Or the Philadelphia Coons? The Arizona Spics? The Milwaukee Svennes? The Cleveland Polacks? The Boston Micks? And think of the logos for each team...

And yet, I wince at all of it. My sensitivities tell me this is all wrong, but unless we go through the exercise, we hear the all too familiar "It's traditional!" or "Hey! Nobody's bothered by this, so what's the fuss?" Well, maybe there is something wrong with names like Redskins at least, and probably Braves, Indians, Seminoles, and the like.

And for those who think what's the harm in ethnic names, get a load of this current soccer team in the Netherlands which has a nickname of "Jews," and where rival fans scream about sending the Jews to the gas chambers...Ah, the European disease of anti-Semitism lives on...

1 Comments:

At 1:37 PM, Anonymous hip703 said...

I am Irish Catholic, born and reared on the South Side of Chicago. The name Notre Dame Fighting Irish does not offend me.

(I agree that "Redskins" is over the top. Gregg Easterbrook (brother of Judge Frank, on the Seventh Circuit), who writes the the Tuesday Morning Quarterback for ESPN (the most well-written weekly column on any subject in the United States, IMO) refuses to use the name Redskins and instead refers to the team as the "Potomac Drainage Basin Indigenous Persons." Easterbrook has proposed changing the team name to "Nanticokes," in honor of the the Native American tribe indigenous to the Chesapeake Bay area.

Some of this, though, can be silly. My alma mater is Marquette University in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. For many years, they were known as the Warriors. The Warriors won the 1977 NCAA men's basketball championship. They still had that name when I graduated in 19993. The next year, they changed it to "Golden Eagles," because an autocratic, politically correct president assumed power. (What was particularly stupid was that "Golden Eagles" was the same name as the athletic teams of Boston College, another Jesuit University.)

What on earth is offensive about the term "Warriors"? True, the team had a Native American mascot and logo. But get rid of the mascot and change the logo. The Golden State Warriors play in the most politically correct region in the United States. I have not heard any calls there for he team to change its name.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home